‘It’s killing us’: firefighters impact of flame retardants
Incident Commander Deputy Jay Fleming briefing the media
Special note by The Firefly Innovations on the article:-
- Well done to the Deputy Fleming. This what is needed.
- An outreach that opens the door that there can be a comprehensive approach.
- Via Head-on you can now help
- Therefore we ask for your help.
- Click & learn what happens and
- how you can join “Click learn and donate“ to reduce the wildfire impact.
and stand a chance to win an $10,000 African Safari for your fires station and
for your family
Massachusetts has failed to sign a bill banning flame retardants into law despite endorsement of lawmakers and pediatricians and concerns over safety.
Jay Fleming is a booming Boston firefighter who has climbed the ranks since 1978. He has two engineering degrees, a no-nonsense manner and thick accent.
For the last seven years, he has applied his considerable wit to banning flame retardant chemicals in Massachusetts, which might sound counter intuitive to those not steeped in the byzantine logic of American chemical regulation.
“Firefighters are like the canary in the mine,” said Fleming. “If there is a problem with these chemicals, we’re going to get it,” said Fleming. “We’re exposed to the highest level.”
Fleming has watched colleagues die of cancer since he started in the department. His father was also a firefighter. He died of lung cancer in an era when few firefighters wore masks, let alone the rebreathers available today.
But now, that diagnosis feels less exotic than news his peers get – findings of kidney, bladder and thyroid cancers. The legislator who once carried the bill to ban fire retardants, former firefighter and senator Ken Donnelly, himself died of brain cancer at just 66. Fleming blames flame retardants, some of which have already been designated as likely to cause cancer and which have been found to disrupt the endocrine system, according to the National Institutes of Health.
Already, new generations of the products have been introduced since concerns were first raised about their safety, effects on the human body and persistence in the environment.
“When they started to transition to this plastic stuff [in the home], it just produced smoke that was a lot more irritating,” said Fleming. Firefighters never said to “add flame retardants, they just said address the plastics problem, because it’s killing us [from the smoke while fighting fires] … The solution to adding chemicals to the furniture was to add more chemicals to the furniture.”
Fire retardant chemicals were first proposed by tobacco companies as a solution to fires started by cigarettes in the 1970s. Rather than reformulate their products, they suggested, society could reformulate everything else.
At the same time, studies have shown children exposed to flame retardants are more likely to have poorer social skills. Exposure in utero could have lower the overall IQ and working memory. Some studies have shown disruption to thyroid functions and a possible link to cancer. The chemicals also bioaccumulate in the body. Flame retardants have been found at “considerable” levels in freshwater and in midwestern bobcats.
But all this time – despite the endorsement of pediatricians, firefighters and lawmakers – Massachusetts has failed to sign a bill into law.
Opposing the bill, despite its many backers, has been the American Chemistry Council (ACC).
Re Blog from,:-The Guardian
Thank you, The Firefly Innovations
Develop your innovation skills
build a better future
Innovations for a better future